NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs ATI Radeon X1650 PRO
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti and ATI Radeon X1650 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 53% higher core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 42.7x more texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 51.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4412 vs 85
- Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 468 vs 241
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 16 August 2012 vs 23 August 2006 |
| Core clock speed | 915 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4412 vs 85 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 468 vs 241 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1650 PRO
- 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 44 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 233.3x more memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 44 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1650 PRO
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | ATI Radeon X1650 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4412 | 85 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 468 | 241 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15365 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.256 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.037 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.191 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3285 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3285 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1615 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | ATI Radeon X1650 PRO | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | R500 |
| Code name | GK104 | RV535 |
| Launch date | 16 August 2012 | 23 August 2006 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
| Place in performance rating | 718 | 720 |
| Price now | $321.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.34 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 600 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1344 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 1344 | |
| Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec | 2.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 44 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 330 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192-bit GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 1400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6100 + nForce 400
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 Ti vs
ATIRadeon X1650 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 Ti vs
ATIRadeon X550 XTX
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro M2000M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Pro 555
