AMD Radeon Pro 555 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro 555

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
850x more memory clock speed: 5100 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 vs 468
Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 162.706 vs 82.191
Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4042 vs 3285
Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4042 vs 3285

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 June 2017 vs 16 August 2012
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 150 Watt
Memory clock speed	5100 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	659 vs 468
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	162.706 vs 82.191
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4042 vs 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3349 vs 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4042 vs 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3349 vs 3337

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Around 8% higher core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 850 MHz
2.5x more texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 40.8 GTexel / s
Around 75% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 768
Around 88% better floating-point performance: 2,459.5 gflops vs 1,306 gflops
Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4411 vs 3141
Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15349 vs 11510
Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.256 vs 31.301
Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1029.267 vs 572.795
Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.037 vs 2.83
Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.894 vs 26.388
Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 2221
Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 2221

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	915 MHz vs 850 MHz
Texture fill rate	102.5 billion / sec vs 40.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1344 vs 768
Floating-point performance	2,459.5 gflops vs 1,306 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	4411 vs 3141
Geekbench - OpenCL	15349 vs 11510
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	36.256 vs 31.301
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1029.267 vs 572.795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.037 vs 2.83
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	45.894 vs 26.388
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3684 vs 2221
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3684 vs 2221

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3141

4411

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

659

468

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

11510

15349

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

31.301

36.256

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

572.795

1029.267

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.83

3.037

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

26.388

45.894

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

162.706

82.191

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4042

3285

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2221

3684

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3349

3337

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4042

3285

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2221

3684

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3349

3337

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 555	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark	3141	4411
PassMark - G2D Mark	659	468
Geekbench - OpenCL	11510	15349
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	31.301	36.256
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	572.795	1029.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.83	3.037
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	26.388	45.894
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	162.706	82.191
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4042	3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2221	3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3349	3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4042	3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2221	3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3349	3337
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1615

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 555	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Kepler
Code name	Polaris 21	GK104
Launch date	5 June 2017	16 August 2012
Place in performance rating	715	718
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$299
Price now		$321.99
Value for money (0-100)		17.34
Technical info
Core clock speed	850 MHz	915 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,306 gflops	2,459.5 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	768	1344
Texture fill rate	40.8 GTexel / s	102.5 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	150 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	3,540 million
Boost clock speed		980 MHz
CUDA cores		1344
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	Two 6-pin
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		9.5" (24.1 cm)
SLI options		3-way
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	81.6 GB / s	144.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192-bit GDDR5
Memory clock speed	5100 MHz	6.0 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA