NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2000M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 915 MHz
Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1098 MHz vs 980 MHz
2.7x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 150 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
835.3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 47.281 vs 36.256
Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.5 vs 3.037
Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.048 vs 45.894
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 172.896 vs 82.191
Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4920 vs 3285
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3684
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3337
Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4920 vs 3285
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3684
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3337

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	3 December 2015 vs 16 August 2012
Core clock speed	1029 MHz vs 915 MHz
Boost clock speed	1098 MHz vs 980 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 150 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	47.281 vs 36.256
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.5 vs 3.037
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	51.048 vs 45.894
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	172.896 vs 82.191
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4920 vs 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355 vs 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4920 vs 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355 vs 3337

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

2.3x more texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 43.92 GTexel / s
2.1x more pipelines: 1344 vs 640
Around 75% better floating-point performance: 2,459.5 gflops vs 1,405 gflops
Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4411 vs 3447
Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 468 vs 337
Around 88% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15349 vs 8148
Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1029.267 vs 782.113

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	102.5 billion / sec vs 43.92 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1344 vs 640
Floating-point performance	2,459.5 gflops vs 1,405 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	4411 vs 3447
PassMark - G2D Mark	468 vs 337
Geekbench - OpenCL	15349 vs 8148
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1029.267 vs 782.113

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3447

4411

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

337

468

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8148

15349

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

47.281

36.256

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

782.113

1029.267

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.5

3.037

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

51.048

45.894

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

172.896

82.191

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4920

3285

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3684

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

3337

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4920

3285

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3684

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

3337

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark	3447	4411
PassMark - G2D Mark	337	468
Geekbench - OpenCL	8148	15349
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	47.281	36.256
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	782.113	1029.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.5	3.037
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	51.048	45.894
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	172.896	82.191
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4920	3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355	3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4920	3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355	3337
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1615

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Code name	GM107	GK104
Launch date	3 December 2015	16 August 2012
Place in performance rating	716	718
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$299
Price now		$321.99
Value for money (0-100)		17.34
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1098 MHz	980 MHz
Core clock speed	1029 MHz	915 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,405 gflops	2,459.5 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	640	1344
Texture fill rate	43.92 GTexel / s	102.5 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt	150 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,540 million
CUDA cores		1344
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Display Port	1.2
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	Two 6-pin
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		9.5" (24.1 cm)
SLI options		3-way
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.3
Shader Model	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	80 GB / s	144.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192-bit GDDR5
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	6.0 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA