NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • 2.3x more texture fill rate: 78.4 billion / sec vs 33.6 billion / sec
  • 8.6x more pipelines: 960 vs 112
  • 5.9x better floating-point performance: 1,981 gflops vs 336.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
  • 8.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 vs 454
  • 8.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 56
  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 2845
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 vs 3304
  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 2845
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 vs 3304
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 6 September 2012 vs 21 July 2008
Texture fill rate 78.4 billion / sec vs 33.6 billion / sec
Pipelines 960 vs 112
Floating-point performance 1,981 gflops vs 336.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 4017 vs 454
PassMark - G2D Mark 487 vs 56
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3690 vs 2845
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3365 vs 3304
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3690 vs 2845
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3365 vs 3304

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

  • Around 53% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 980 MHz
  • Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 105 Watt vs 140 Watt
  • 150x more memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Core clock speed 1500 MHz vs 980 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 105 Watt vs 140 Watt
Memory clock speed 900 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
4017
454
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
487
56
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3690
2845
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3365
3304
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3690
2845
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3365
3304
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark 4017 454
PassMark - G2D Mark 487 56
Geekbench - OpenCL 11364
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 30.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 705.293
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.085
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 35.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 62.69
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3581
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3690 2845
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3365 3304
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3581
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3690 2845
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3365 3304
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1307

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Tesla
Code name GK106 G92
Launch date 6 September 2012 21 July 2008
Launch price (MSRP) $229 $160
Place in performance rating 740 1063
Price now $349.99 $103.99
Type Desktop Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 14.35 8.86

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1033 MHz
Core clock speed 980 MHz 1500 MHz
CUDA cores 960 112
Floating-point performance 1,981 gflops 336.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 960 112
Texture fill rate 78.4 billion / sec 33.6 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 140 Watt 105 Watt
Transistor count 2,540 million 754 million
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C

Video outputs and ports

Audio input for HDMI Internal S / PDIF
Display Connectors One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 9.5" (24.1 cm) 9" (22.9 cm)
Supplementary power connectors One 6-pin 2x 6-pin
SLI options 2-way

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.0
OpenGL 4.3 2.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 144.2 GB / s 57.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 192-bit GDDR5 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 6.0 GB/s 900 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA