NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 40% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 700 MHz
- Environ 87% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 78.4 billion / sec versus 42 billion / sec
- 2x plus de pipelines: 960 versus 480
- Environ 47% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,981 gflops versus 1,345.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 79% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 140 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 2 GB versus 1536 MB
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 484 versus 430
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.416 versus 30.405
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 versus 3658
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 versus 3320
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 versus 3658
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 versus 3320
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 6 September 2012 versus 26 March 2010 |
Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 700 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 78.4 billion / sec versus 42 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 960 versus 480 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,981 gflops versus 1,345.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1536 MB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 484 versus 430 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 versus 30.405 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 versus 3658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 versus 3320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 versus 3658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 versus 3320 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
- 308x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4121 versus 4014
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 13144 versus 11372
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.483 versus 30.505
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.245 versus 3.085
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 106.875 versus 62.69
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5110 versus 3581
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5110 versus 3581
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) versus 6.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4121 versus 4014 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13144 versus 11372 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.483 versus 30.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 706.104 versus 705.293 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.245 versus 3.085 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 106.875 versus 62.69 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5110 versus 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5110 versus 3581 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4014 | 4121 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 484 | 430 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11372 | 13144 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 | 34.483 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 | 706.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 | 4.245 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 | 30.405 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 | 106.875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 | 5110 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | 3658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 | 3320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 | 5110 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | 3658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 | 3320 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Nom de code | GK106 | GF100 |
Date de sortie | 6 September 2012 | 26 March 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 757 | 758 |
Prix maintenant | $349.99 | $71.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.35 | 61.35 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1033 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz | 700 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 960 | 480 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,981 gflops | 1,345.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 960 | 480 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 78.4 billion / sec | 42 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 3,100 million |
Température maximale du GPU | 105 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Connecteurs d’écran | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | 6-pin & 8-pin |
Options SLI | 2-way, 3-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 144.2 GB / s | 177.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192-bit GDDR5 | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6.0 GB/s | 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |