NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 vs Intel HD Graphics 3000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 and Intel HD Graphics 3000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 60.3x more texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 1.7 GTexel / s
- 112x more pipelines: 1344 vs 12
- 120.6x better floating-point performance: 2,459.5 gflops vs 20.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 20.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5345 vs 261
- 15.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 537 vs 35
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3686 vs 1137
- 33.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 101
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3686 vs 1137
- 33.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 101
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 May 2012 vs 1 February 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec vs 1.7 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 12 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops vs 20.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5345 vs 261 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 537 vs 35 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 vs 1137 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 101 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 vs 1137 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 101 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 3000
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 980 MHz
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 3000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5345 | 261 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 537 | 35 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15511 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.613 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 971.208 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.281 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.404 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.208 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7038 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 | 1137 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 101 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7038 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | 1137 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 101 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1839 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Generation 6.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | Sandy Bridge GT2 |
| Launch date | 10 May 2012 | 1 February 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Place in performance rating | 554 | 1604 |
| Price now | $474.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.20 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 850 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1344 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops | 20.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 1344 | 12 |
| Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec | 1.7 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 995 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256-bit GDDR5 | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 205 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670 vs
NVIDIAGRID K260Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P600
