NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 42.7x more texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 110 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 66x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5345 vs 81
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 537 vs 294
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 May 2012 vs 9 August 2004 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 110 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5345 vs 81 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 537 vs 294 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
- 6.8x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 83.3x more memory clock speed: 500 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 170 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 500 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5345 | 81 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 537 | 294 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15511 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.613 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 971.208 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.281 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.404 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.208 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7038 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7038 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1839 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Curie |
| Code name | GK104 | NV43 A2 |
| Launch date | 10 May 2012 | 9 August 2004 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $299 |
| Place in performance rating | 554 | 588 |
| Price now | $474.99 | $59.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.20 | 1.71 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 300 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1344 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 110 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 1344 | |
| Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec | 2.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 146 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 198 mm |
| SLI options | 3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256-bit GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
