NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 336 vs 288
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 49% higher maximum memory size: 1526 MB vs 1 GB
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.72 vs 1.693
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.916 vs 27.232
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 52.899 vs 50.114
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3627 vs 3114
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3627 vs 3114
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 vs 20 February 2012 |
Pipelines | 336 vs 288 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1526 MB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.72 vs 1.693 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.916 vs 27.232 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 52.899 vs 50.114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3627 vs 3114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3627 vs 3114 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 736 MHz vs 598 MHz
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 35.33 GTexel / s vs 33.5 billion / sec
- Around 5% better floating-point performance: 847.9 gflops vs 803.7 gflops
- 2.6x more memory clock speed: 3828 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1914 vs 1757
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 423 vs 307
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7009 vs 6448
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.456 vs 15.053
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 618.773 vs 588.645
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 2731
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 2731
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 736 MHz vs 598 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 35.33 GTexel / s vs 33.5 billion / sec |
Floating-point performance | 847.9 gflops vs 803.7 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 3828 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1914 vs 1757 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 vs 307 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7009 vs 6448 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.456 vs 15.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 618.773 vs 588.645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 vs 2731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 vs 2731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1757 | 1914 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 423 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6448 | 7009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.053 | 18.456 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.645 | 618.773 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.72 | 1.693 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.916 | 27.232 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 52.899 | 50.114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2731 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3627 | 3114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2731 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3627 | 3114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2062 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GF114 | GF114 |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 | 20 February 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 968 | 969 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $89.99 | |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 28.95 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 598 MHz | 736 MHz |
CUDA cores | 336 | |
Floating-point performance | 803.7 gflops | 847.9 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 336 | 288 |
Texture fill rate | 33.5 billion / sec | 35.33 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Length | 210 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1526 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72.0 GB / s | 91.87 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 3828 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
SLI |