NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• Around 17% higher pipelines: 336 vs 288
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
• Around 49% higher maximum memory size: 1526 MB vs 1 GB
• Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6858 vs 6235
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.72 vs 1.693
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.916 vs 27.232
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 52.899 vs 50.114
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3627 vs 3114
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3627 vs 3114

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

• Around 23% higher core clock speed: 736 MHz vs 598 MHz
• Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 35.33 GTexel / s vs 33.5 billion / sec
• Around 5% better floating-point performance: 847.9 gflops vs 803.7 gflops
• 2.6x more memory clock speed: 3828 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1914 vs 1737
• Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 423 vs 303
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.456 vs 15.053
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 618.773 vs 588.645
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 2731
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 2731

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1737 1914
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	303 423
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6858 6235
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.053 18.456
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	588.645 618.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.72 1.693
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.916 27.232
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	52.899 50.114
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2731 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3627 3114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2731 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3627 3114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3356

Compare specifications (specs)