NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 17% de pipelines plus haut: 336 versus 288
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 49% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 1526 MB versus 1 GB
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.72 versus 1.693
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.916 versus 27.232
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 52.899 versus 50.114
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3627 versus 3114
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3627 versus 3114
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 versus 20 February 2012 |
| Pipelines | 336 versus 288 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 150 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 1526 MB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.72 versus 1.693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.916 versus 27.232 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 52.899 versus 50.114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3627 versus 3114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3627 versus 3114 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
- Environ 23% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 736 MHz versus 598 MHz
- Environ 5% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 35.33 GTexel / s versus 33.5 billion / sec
- Environ 5% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 847.9 gflops versus 803.7 gflops
- 2.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 3828 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1914 versus 1757
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 423 versus 307
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7009 versus 6448
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.456 versus 15.053
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 618.773 versus 588.645
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 versus 2731
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 versus 2731
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 736 MHz versus 598 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 35.33 GTexel / s versus 33.5 billion / sec |
| Performance á point flottant | 847.9 gflops versus 803.7 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3828 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1914 versus 1757 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 versus 307 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7009 versus 6448 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.456 versus 15.053 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 618.773 versus 588.645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 versus 2731 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 versus 2731 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3346 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1757 | 1914 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 423 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6448 | 7009 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.053 | 18.456 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.645 | 618.773 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.72 | 1.693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.916 | 27.232 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 52.899 | 50.114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2731 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3627 | 3114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2731 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3627 | 3114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2062 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GF114 | GF114 |
| Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 | 20 February 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 968 | 969 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $89.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $89.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 28.95 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 598 MHz | 736 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 336 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 803.7 gflops | 847.9 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 336 | 288 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 33.5 billion / sec | 35.33 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,950 million | 1,950 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
| Longeur | 210 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1526 MB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 72.0 GB / s | 91.87 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz | 3828 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670M vs
ATIRadeon HD 5730
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 SE
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 645 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670M vs
AMDFirePro W4100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670M vs
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded
