NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs AMD Radeon HD 6650M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M and AMD Radeon HD 6650M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 720 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 5.6x more texture fill rate: 80.6 billion / sec vs 14.4 GTexel / s
- 2.8x more pipelines: 1344 vs 480
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 2,038 gflops vs 576.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3252 vs 750
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 345 vs 222
- Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9400 vs 5780
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2409 vs 1866
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2409 vs 1866
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 June 2012 vs 4 January 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 720 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 80.6 billion / sec vs 14.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 480 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,038 gflops vs 576.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3252 vs 750 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 345 vs 222 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9400 vs 5780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2409 vs 1866 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2409 vs 1866 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6650M
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 3111
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 3111
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 vs 3111 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 vs 3111 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6650M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M | AMD Radeon HD 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3252 | 750 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 345 | 222 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9400 | 5780 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.081 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 879.575 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.823 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.155 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.75 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1263 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2409 | 1866 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3111 | 3334 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1263 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2409 | 1866 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3111 | 3334 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M | AMD Radeon HD 6650M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GK104 | Whistler |
| Launch date | 4 June 2012 | 4 January 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $310.50 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1047 | 1050 |
| Price now | $499.99 | |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.46 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 758 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 600 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1344 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,038 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1344 | 480 |
| Texture fill rate | 80.6 billion / sec | 14.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6650M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6750
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 550 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 765M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680M vs
NVIDIAGRID K160Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650
