NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX vs NVIDIA Quadro 7000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX and NVIDIA Quadro 7000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• Around 11% higher core clock speed: 720 MHz vs 651 MHz
• 2.2x more texture fill rate: 92.2 billion / sec vs 41.66 GTexel / s
• 3x more pipelines: 1536 vs 512
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 204 Watt
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3593 vs 3505
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 440 vs 397

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 7000

• 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 36% higher memory clock speed: 3404 MHz vs 2500 MHz
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 32.699 vs 25.421
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1142.156 vs 734.936
• Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.796 vs 2.31
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.693 vs 35.434
• Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 110.277 vs 56.706
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 3571
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3336
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 3571
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3336

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 7000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3593 3505
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	440 397
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.421 32.699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	734.936 1142.156
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.31 3.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.434 51.693
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	56.706 110.277
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3571 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3571 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3353

Compare specifications (specs)