NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 vs NVIDIA Quadro 7000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 and NVIDIA Quadro 7000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 651 MHz
- 5.6x more texture fill rate: 234 billion / sec vs 41.66 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 512
- 4.7x better floating-point performance: 2x 3,130 gflops vs 1,332 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 76% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 3404 MHz
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5491 vs 3505
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 vs 397
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.352 vs 32.699
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 915 MHz vs 651 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 234 billion / sec vs 41.66 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 3,130 gflops vs 1,332 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 3404 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5491 vs 3505 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 vs 397 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.352 vs 32.699 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 7000
- Around 47% lower typical power consumption: 204 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1142.156 vs 930.114
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.796 vs 3.656
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.693 vs 29.836
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 110.277 vs 97.861
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 1849
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1673
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 1849
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1673
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 204 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1142.156 vs 930.114 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.796 vs 3.656 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.693 vs 29.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 110.277 vs 97.861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 vs 1849 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 1673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 vs 1849 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 1673 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 7000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 | NVIDIA Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5491 | 3505 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 | 397 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16577 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.352 | 32.699 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.114 | 1142.156 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.656 | 3.796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.836 | 51.693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.861 | 110.277 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6875 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1849 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1673 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6875 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1849 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1673 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 | NVIDIA Quadro 7000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | GF110 |
| Launch date | 3 May 2012 | 2 May 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $14,499 |
| Place in performance rating | 750 | 707 |
| Price now | $999 | |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.01 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1019 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 651 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 3072 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 3,130 gflops | 1,332 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 234 billion / sec | 41.66 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 204 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Two Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini... | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 11.0" (27.9 cm) | 248 mm |
| SLI options | Quad | |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 384 GB / s | 177.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 512-bit (256-bit per GPU) | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 3404 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 690 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X600 SE
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 690 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6100 + nForce 420
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 690 vs
ATIFireGL V3600
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 690 vs
NVIDIATesla K20Xm
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 690 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 690 vs
IntelHD Graphics 5600
