NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 versus NVIDIA Quadro 7000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 and NVIDIA Quadro 7000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
- Environ 41% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 915 MHz versus 651 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 234 billion / sec versus 41.66 GTexel / s
- 6x plus de pipelines: 2x 1536 versus 512
- 4.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 3,130 gflops versus 1,332 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 76% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 3404 MHz
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5491 versus 3505
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 versus 397
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.352 versus 32.699
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 915 MHz versus 651 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 234 billion / sec versus 41.66 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 3,130 gflops versus 1,332 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 3404 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5491 versus 3505 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 versus 397 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.352 versus 32.699 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 7000
- Environ 47% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 204 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 6 GB versus 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1142.156 versus 930.114
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.796 versus 3.656
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.693 versus 29.836
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 110.277 versus 97.861
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 versus 1849
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 1673
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 versus 1849
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 1673
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 204 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1142.156 versus 930.114 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.796 versus 3.656 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.693 versus 29.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 110.277 versus 97.861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 versus 1849 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 1673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 versus 1849 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 1673 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 7000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 | NVIDIA Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5491 | 3505 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 | 397 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16577 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.352 | 32.699 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.114 | 1142.156 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.656 | 3.796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.836 | 51.693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.861 | 110.277 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6875 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1849 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1673 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6875 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1849 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1673 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 | NVIDIA Quadro 7000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GK104 | GF110 |
| Date de sortie | 3 May 2012 | 2 May 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | $14,499 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 750 | 707 |
| Prix maintenant | $999 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.01 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1019 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 915 MHz | 651 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 3072 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 3,130 gflops | 1,332 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 | 512 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 234 billion / sec | 41.66 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 204 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Two Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini... | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 11.0" (27.9 cm) | 248 mm |
| Options SLI | Quad | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 384 GB / s | 177.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 512-bit (256-bit per GPU) | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 3404 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 690 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X600 SE
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 690 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6100 + nForce 420
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 690 vs
ATIFireGL V3600
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 690 vs
NVIDIATesla K20Xm
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 690 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 690 vs
IntelHD Graphics 5600
