NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 915 MHz
• Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 1019 MHz
• 5.5x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 300 Watt
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 511 vs 465
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32 vs 29.836
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 1849
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 1673
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 1849
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 1673

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

• 6.7x more texture fill rate: 234 billion / sec vs 34.72 GTexel / s
• 6x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 512
• 5.6x better floating-point performance: 2x 3,130 gflops vs 1,111 gflops
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 vs 1 GB
• 1201.6x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
• Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5491 vs 3342
• Around 79% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16577 vs 9284
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.352 vs 34.239
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 930.114 vs 639.427
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.656 vs 2.341
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.861 vs 69.814
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6875 vs 4498
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6875 vs 4498

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3342 5491
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	511 465
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9284 16577
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	34.239 46.352
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	639.427 930.114
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.341 3.656
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32 29.836
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	69.814 97.861
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4498 6875
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3704 1849
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 1673
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4498 6875
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3704 1849
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 1673

Compare specifications (specs)