NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs ATI Radeon HD 5830
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and ATI Radeon HD 5830 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 800 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 175 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3904 vs 1735
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 512 vs 403
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 25 February 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3904 vs 1735 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 512 vs 403 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5830
- Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 44.8 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 1120 vs 640
- Around 29% better floating-point performance: 1,792.0 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
- 800x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Texture fill rate | 44.8 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1120 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 1,792.0 gflops vs 1,389 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5830
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | ATI Radeon HD 5830 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3904 | 1735 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 512 | 403 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11325 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1265 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | ATI Radeon HD 5830 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM107 | Cypress |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 25 February 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Place in performance rating | 704 | 531 |
Price now | $299.01 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | 800 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 800 MHz |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 1,792.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1120 |
Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s | 44.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 175 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,154 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 282 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA | ||
AMD Eyefinity |