NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 850 MHz
• Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 925 MHz
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 200 Watt
• Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3904 vs 2718
• Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 512 vs 367
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 40.311
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 4396
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 4396

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM

• 2.4x more texture fill rate: 103.6 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
• 2.8x more pipelines: 1792 vs 640
• 2.4x better floating-point performance: 3,315 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
• 1000x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
• Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13777 vs 11329
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 795.334 vs 642.715
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.328 vs 2.933
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.205 vs 26.532
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 181.508 vs 133.458
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 3683
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 3329
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 3683
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 3329

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3904 2718
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	512 367
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11329 13777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42.463 40.311
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	642.715 795.334
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.933 3.328
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.532 64.205
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	133.458 181.508
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4843 4396
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3683 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3329 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4843 4396
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3683 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3329 3348

Compare specifications (specs)