NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Intel HD Graphics 4600

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• 2.6x more core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 400 MHz
• 8.7x more texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
• 32x more pipelines: 640 vs 20
• 27.8x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 50 gflops
• 6.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 630
• Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 314
• 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 3210
• 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 8.844
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 171.17
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 1.115
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 vs 10.385
• 10.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 12.361
• 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 988
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1702
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 2808
• 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 988
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1702
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 2808

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600

• Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1085 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 60 Watt
• Around 66% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 194 vs 117

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3901 630
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	521 314
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11526 3210
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42.463 8.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	642.715 171.17
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.933 1.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.532 10.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	133.458 12.361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4843 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3683 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3329 2808
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4843 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3683 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3329 2808
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	117 194

Compare specifications (specs)