NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 4.9x more texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 8.8 billion / sec
- 20x more pipelines: 640 vs 32
- 15.5x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 89.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 / 512 MB
- 22.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 172
- 16.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 32
- 69.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 0.612
- 11.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 56.838
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 1505
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 1505
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 29 July 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s vs 8.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 640 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops vs 89.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 / 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 vs 172 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 vs 32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 vs 0.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 vs 56.838 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 1505 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 1505 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1020 MHz
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 60 Watt
- 160x more memory clock speed: 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1020 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz vs 5.4 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 | 172 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 | 32 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | 0.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | 56.838 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 1505 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 1505 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 117 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla |
Code name | GM107 | G96C |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 29 July 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | $85.99 |
Place in performance rating | 707 | 1666 |
Price now | $299.01 | $85.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | 4.13 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 1400 MHz |
CUDA cores | 640 | 32 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 89.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s | 8.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 314 million |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | S / PDIF |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVISingle Link DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 6.875" (17.5 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 / 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | 25.6 (GDDR3) and 16.0 (DDR2) |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA | ||
SLI |