NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 73% higher texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 25.1 billion / sec
- 3.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 192
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 601.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 77% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 106 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 1322
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 310
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 4907
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 14.758
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 302.509
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 0.965
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 vs 14.925
- 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 27.656
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 2160
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 3365
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 2160
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 3365
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 13 September 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s vs 25.1 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 640 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops vs 601.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 106 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 vs 1322 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 vs 310 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 vs 4907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 vs 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 vs 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 vs 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 vs 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 vs 27.656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 vs 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 vs 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 3325 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 1566 MHz vs 1020 MHz
- 360.8x more memory clock speed: 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Core clock speed | 1566 MHz vs 1020 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 5.4 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 | 1322 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 | 310 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 | 4907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | 27.656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 3325 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 117 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
Code name | GM107 | GF106 |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 13 September 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | $129 |
Place in performance rating | 707 | 1130 |
Price now | $299.01 | $64.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | 26.46 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 1566 MHz |
CUDA cores | 640 | 192 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 601.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s | 25.1 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 106 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,170 million |
Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | 57.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |