NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 480
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 3.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 219 Watt
- Environ 60% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 2 GB versus 1280 MB
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 517 versus 473
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 versus 36.849
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 versus 122.953
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 versus 7 December 2010 |
Pipelines | 640 versus 480 |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 219 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1280 MB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 517 versus 473 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 versus 36.849 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 versus 122.953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 3668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 versus 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 3668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 versus 3325 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
- Environ 44% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1464 MHz versus 1020 MHz
- Environ 1% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 43.9 billion / sec versus 43.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 1% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,405.4 gflops versus 1,389 gflops
- 380x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) versus 5.4 GB/s
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3928 versus 3898
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 13352 versus 11512
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 736.185 versus 642.715
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.369 versus 2.933
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.08 versus 26.532
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1464 MHz versus 1020 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.9 billion / sec versus 43.4 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 1,405.4 gflops versus 1,389 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) versus 5.4 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3928 versus 3898 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13352 versus 11512 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.185 versus 642.715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.369 versus 2.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.08 versus 26.532 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4862 versus 4843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4862 versus 4843 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3898 | 3928 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 517 | 473 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11512 | 13352 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | 36.849 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | 736.185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | 4.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | 40.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | 122.953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | 4862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | 4862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 3325 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 116 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GM107 | GF110 |
Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 | 7 December 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | $349 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 726 | 729 |
Prix maintenant | $299.01 | $99.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.02 | 48.11 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz | 1464 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 640 | 480 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops | 1,405.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 480 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.4 GTexel / s | 43.9 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 219 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 3,000 million |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | Two 6-pin |
Options SLI | 3-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1280 MB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 86.4 GB / s | 152.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 320 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5.4 GB/s | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |