NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 85% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 4.9x more texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s
- 13.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 48
- 12x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 116.16 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 16.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 231
- 9.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 53
- Around 76% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 6543
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 1814
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 1814
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 7 January 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 550 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops vs 116.16 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 vs 231 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 vs 53 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 vs 6543 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 1814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 1814 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
- Around 71% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 60 Watt
- 316x more memory clock speed: 1580 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 60 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 | 231 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 | 53 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 | 6543 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 1814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 1814 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 117 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | GT216 |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 7 January 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Place in performance rating | 707 | 1561 |
| Price now | $299.01 | |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 550 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 116.16 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s | 8.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 486 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | 25.28 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | 1580 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3, DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150 + nForce 630i
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4670
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDFirePro S7100X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Pro 555
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100
