NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 980 MHz
• Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 1033 MHz
• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 140 Watt
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 515 vs 487
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.239 vs 30.505
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 69.814 vs 62.69
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4498 vs 3581
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4498 vs 3581

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

• 2.3x more texture fill rate: 78.4 billion / sec vs 34.72 GTexel / s
• Around 88% higher pipelines: 960 vs 512
• Around 78% better floating-point performance: 1,981 gflops vs 1,111 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6.0 GB/s vs 5.0 GB/s
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 vs 3337
• Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11364 vs 9306
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.293 vs 639.427
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 vs 2.341
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.416 vs 32
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 vs 3346
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 vs 3346
• Around 24% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1307 vs 1050

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 4017
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	515 487
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9306 11364
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	34.239 30.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	639.427 705.293
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.341 3.085
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32 35.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	69.814 62.69
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4498 3581
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3704 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3365
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4498 3581
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3704 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3365
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1050 1307

Compare specifications (specs)