NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 980 MHz
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1085 MHz versus 1033 MHz
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 140 Watt
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 515 versus 487
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.239 versus 30.505
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 69.814 versus 62.69
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4498 versus 3581
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4498 versus 3581
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 versus 6 September 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz versus 980 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz versus 1033 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt versus 140 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 versus 487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 versus 30.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 versus 62.69 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 versus 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 versus 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 3690 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 78.4 billion / sec versus 34.72 GTexel / s
- Environ 88% de pipelines plus haut: 960 versus 512
- Environ 78% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,981 gflops versus 1,111 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 20% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6.0 GB/s versus 5.0 GB/s
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 versus 3337
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11364 versus 9306
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.293 versus 639.427
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 versus 2.341
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.416 versus 32
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 versus 3346
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 versus 3346
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1307 versus 1050
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 78.4 billion / sec versus 34.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 960 versus 512 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,981 gflops versus 1,111 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6.0 GB/s versus 5.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 versus 3337 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11364 versus 9306 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 versus 639.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 versus 2.341 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 versus 32 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 versus 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 versus 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 versus 1050 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3337 | 4017 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 | 487 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9306 | 11364 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 | 30.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 | 705.293 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 | 3.085 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 | 35.416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 | 62.69 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 | 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 | 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3365 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1050 | 1307 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM107 | GK106 |
Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 | 6 September 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $119 | $229 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 724 | 740 |
Prix maintenant | $150.99 | $349.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.54 | 14.35 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz | 980 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 512 | 960 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,111 gflops | 1,981 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Pipelines | 512 | 960 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.72 GTexel / s | 78.4 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 140 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 2,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5.0 GB/s | 6.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
SLI |