NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 24% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 823 MHz
- Environ 36% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1085 MHz versus 797 MHz
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 122 Watt
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 515 versus 422
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32 versus 13.832
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 versus 3679
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 versus 3679
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 versus 11 May 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz versus 823 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz versus 797 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt versus 122 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 versus 422 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 versus 13.832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 3679 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 102.0 GTexel / s versus 34.72 GTexel / s
- 3x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 512
- 2.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,448 gflops versus 1,111 gflops
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- 500x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 2500 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3808 versus 3337
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12778 versus 9306
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.934 versus 34.239
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.616 versus 639.427
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.631 versus 2.341
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 78.867 versus 69.814
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4868 versus 4498
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4868 versus 4498
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1466 versus 1050
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.0 GTexel / s versus 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,448 gflops versus 1,111 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3808 versus 3337 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12778 versus 9306 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 versus 34.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.616 versus 639.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 versus 2.341 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 78.867 versus 69.814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4868 versus 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4868 versus 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 versus 1050 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3337 | 3808 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 | 422 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9306 | 12778 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 | 39.934 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 | 705.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 | 3.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 | 13.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 | 78.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 | 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 | 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1050 | 1466 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 | 11 May 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $119 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 724 | 725 |
| Prix maintenant | $150.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.54 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 512 | 1536 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,111 gflops | 2,448 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.72 GTexel / s | 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | No outputs |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5.0 GB/s | 2500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
ATIFireGL V5100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6150
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1800
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8870M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M
