NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 94.1 billion / sec vs 89.6 GTexel / s
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 170 Watt vs 200 Watt
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Launch date | 25 June 2013 vs 7 March 2013 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec vs 89.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
- Around 56% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1152
- Around 21% better floating-point performance: 2,867 gflops vs 2,378 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.802 vs 37.505
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1230.769 vs 864.402
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.68 vs 40.457
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 370.179 vs 84.186
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1152 |
Floating-point performance | 2,867 gflops vs 2,378 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.802 vs 37.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1230.769 vs 864.402 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.68 vs 40.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 370.179 vs 84.186 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4798 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 529 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14290 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.505 | 67.802 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.402 | 1230.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.09 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.457 | 81.68 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.186 | 370.179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1660 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK104 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 25 June 2013 | 7 March 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | $449 |
Place in performance rating | 598 | 599 |
Price now | $249.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.69 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 800 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1152 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,378 gflops | 2,867 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 1152 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec | 89.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 279 mm |
Minimum recommended system power | 500 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | 240.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |