NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M vs AMD FirePro V7900

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M and AMD FirePro V7900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 12% higher core clock speed: 811 MHz vs 725 MHz
• Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 63.76 GTexel / s vs 58.0 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 151 Watt
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2794 vs 2305
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 341 vs 336
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 29.528 vs 14.134
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 731.755 vs 676.409
• Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.486 vs 1.309
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.15 vs 36.678
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4133 vs 2996
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4133 vs 2996

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V7900

• Around 33% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 960
• Around 21% better floating-point performance: 1,856.0 gflops vs 1,530 gflops
• 2.5x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27733 vs 8652
• Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 171.25 vs 87.659
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3651
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3331
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3651
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3331

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V7900

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2794 2305
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	341 336
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8652 27733
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.528 14.134
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	731.755 676.409
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.486 1.309
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42.15 36.678
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	87.659 171.25
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4133 2996
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3651 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3331 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4133 2996
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3651 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3331 3354

Compare specifications (specs)