NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M versus AMD Radeon HD 8790M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M and AMD Radeon HD 8790M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 63.76 GTexel / s versus 21.6 GTexel / s
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 960 versus 384
- 2.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,530 gflops versus 691.2 gflops
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 3 GB versus 2 GB
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2798 versus 1306
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8632 versus 4679
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 29.528 versus 12.759
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 731.755 versus 465.631
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.486 versus 1.576
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.15 versus 28.839
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 87.659 versus 80.418
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4133 versus 2181
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 versus 2656
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 versus 2014
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4133 versus 2181
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 versus 2656
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 versus 2014
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 May 2013 versus 1 April 2013 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 63.76 GTexel / s versus 21.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 960 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,530 gflops versus 691.2 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 3 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2798 versus 1306 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8632 versus 4679 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.528 versus 12.759 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 731.755 versus 465.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.486 versus 1.576 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.15 versus 28.839 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.659 versus 80.418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4133 versus 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 versus 2656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 versus 2014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4133 versus 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 versus 2656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 versus 2014 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8790M
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 850 MHz versus 811 MHz
- Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 850 MHz versus 797 MHz
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 2000 MHz
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 versus 339
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1607 versus 964
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz versus 811 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 850 MHz versus 797 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 2000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 versus 339 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1607 versus 964 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8790M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M | AMD Radeon HD 8790M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2798 | 1306 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 339 | 751 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8632 | 4679 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.528 | 12.759 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 731.755 | 465.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.486 | 1.576 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.15 | 28.839 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.659 | 80.418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4133 | 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 | 2656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 2014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4133 | 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 | 2656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 2014 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 964 | 1607 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M | AMD Radeon HD 8790M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | GK106 | Mars |
Date de sortie | 30 May 2013 | 1 April 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $189.99 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 860 | 861 |
Prix maintenant | $177.99 | |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 19.67 | |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 797 MHz | 850 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 811 MHz | 850 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,530 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 960 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 63.76 GTexel / s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 1,040 million |
Unités de Compute | 6 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
Taille du laptop | large | medium sized |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 3 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 96.0 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
TXAA |