NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 350

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 57% higher core clock speed: 863 MHz vs 550 MHz
• 73x more texture fill rate: 160.5 billion / sec vs 2.2 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
• 24x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 128 MB
• 7.4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 810 MHz
• 92.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7986 vs 86
• Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 vs 378

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 350

• 11.9x lower typical power consumption: 21 Watt vs 250 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 350

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7986 86
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	590 378

Compare specifications (specs)