AMD FirePro W7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W7100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 920 MHz vs 863 MHz
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 663 vs 590
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 24892 vs 23233
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.781 vs 57.735
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.854 vs 5.505
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.086 vs 37.407
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 361.58 vs 174.323
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 August 2014 vs 23 May 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 920 MHz vs 863 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 3 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 663 vs 590 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 24892 vs 23233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.781 vs 57.735 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.854 vs 5.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.086 vs 37.407 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 361.58 vs 174.323 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
- Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 160.5 billion / sec vs 103.0 GTexel / s
- Around 29% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1792
- Around 26% better floating-point performance: 4,156 gflops vs 3,297 gflops
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 400 Watt
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7986 vs 5191
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1269.688 vs 1248.285
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9064 vs 6362
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9064 vs 6362
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 160.5 billion / sec vs 103.0 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1792 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops vs 3,297 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 400 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7986 vs 5191 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1269.688 vs 1248.285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9064 vs 6362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9064 vs 6362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W7100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro W7100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5191 | 7986 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 663 | 590 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 24892 | 23233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.781 | 57.735 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1248.285 | 1269.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.854 | 5.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.086 | 37.407 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 361.58 | 174.323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6362 | 9064 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6362 | 9064 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2777 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro W7100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Tonga | GK110 |
| Launch date | 12 August 2014 | 23 May 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 450 | 451 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
| Price now | $740.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 12.94 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 863 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | 4,156 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 2304 |
| Texture fill rate | 103.0 GTexel / s | 160.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 7,080 million |
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 2304 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HD сomponent video output | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Minimum recommended system power | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| TXAA | ||
