NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 863 MHz
- Around 63% higher boost clock speed: 1468 MHz vs 900 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4096 MB vs 3 GB
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6135 vs 3358
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6135 vs 3358
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 July 2017 vs 23 May 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 863 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4096 MB vs 3 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6135 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6135 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
- 3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 768
- Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23212 vs 19449
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9064 vs 7710
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9064 vs 7710
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 768 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23212 vs 19449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9064 vs 7710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9064 vs 7710 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19449 | 23212 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6135 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6135 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7710 | 9064 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7710 | 9064 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8012 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 589 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 57.735 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1269.688 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.505 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.407 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.323 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2790 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | GP107GL | GK110 |
| Launch date | 5 July 2017 | 23 May 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 467 | 469 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
| Price now | $740.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 12.94 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 863 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 2304 |
| CUDA cores | 2304 | |
| Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
| Texture fill rate | 160.5 billion / sec | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 7,080 million | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4096 MB | 3 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Minimum recommended system power | 600 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon X700 SE
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
ATIFireGL V7200
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
ATIFireGL V5200
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470X
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
