NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 36.08 GTexel / s vs 31.2 billion / sec
- 2.2x more pipelines: 640 vs 288
- Around 54% better floating-point performance: 1,155 gflops vs 748.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2511 vs 1985
- Around 47% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9678 vs 6569
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.761 vs 18.62
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.428 vs 1.755
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.889 vs 24.476
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 vs 48.203
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3817 vs 3044
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 3491
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3108
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3817 vs 3044
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 3491
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3108
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 15 November 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 36.08 GTexel / s vs 31.2 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 640 vs 288 |
Floating-point performance | 1,155 gflops vs 748.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2511 vs 1985 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9678 vs 6569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 vs 18.62 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 vs 1.755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 vs 24.476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 vs 48.203 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 vs 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 3491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3108 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 vs 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 3491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3108 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 359 vs 225
- Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 635.018 vs 388.248
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 359 vs 225 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 635.018 vs 388.248 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2511 | 1985 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | 359 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9678 | 6569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 | 18.62 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 | 635.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 | 1.755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 | 24.476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 | 48.203 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3108 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3108 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
Code name | GM107 | GF104 |
Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 15 November 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 939 | 942 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.95 | |
Technical info |
||
CUDA cores | 640 | 288 |
Floating-point performance | 1,155 gflops | 748.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 288 |
Texture fill rate | 36.08 GTexel / s | 31.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,950 million |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 104 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, 2 x Dual-Link DVI-I1 x Mini HDMI |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | 108.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Vision | ||
DSR | ||
Surround |