NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 90% higher pipelines: 640 vs 336
- Around 27% better floating-point performance: 1,155 gflops vs 907.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 160 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 768 MB
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2513 vs 2263
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9697 vs 7786
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.761 vs 21.445
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.428 vs 1.823
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.889 vs 27.222
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 vs 40.61
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3817 vs 3351
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3817 vs 3351
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 12 July 2010 |
Pipelines | 640 vs 336 |
Floating-point performance | 1,155 gflops vs 907.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 768 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2513 vs 2263 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9697 vs 7786 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 vs 21.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 vs 1.823 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 vs 27.222 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 vs 40.61 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 37.8 GTexel / s vs 36.08 GTexel / s
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 385 vs 226
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 617.847 vs 388.248
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3685
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3685
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 37.8 GTexel / s vs 36.08 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 vs 226 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 617.847 vs 388.248 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2513 | 2263 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 226 | 385 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9697 | 7786 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 | 21.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 | 617.847 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 | 1.823 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 | 27.222 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 | 40.61 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
Code name | GM107 | GF104 |
Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 12 July 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 940 | 943 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 34.71 | |
Technical info |
||
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,155 gflops | 907.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 336 |
Texture fill rate | 36.08 GTexel / s | 37.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 160 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,950 million |
Core clock speed | 675 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Height | 4.376"(111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 8.25"(210 mm) (21 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 768 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Vision |