NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 90% higher pipelines: 640 vs 336
  • Around 27% better floating-point performance: 1,155 gflops vs 907.2 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 160 Watt
  • 2.7x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 768 MB
  • Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2513 vs 2263
  • Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9697 vs 7786
  • Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.761 vs 21.445
  • Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.428 vs 1.823
  • Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.889 vs 27.222
  • 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 vs 40.61
  • Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3817 vs 3351
  • Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3817 vs 3351
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 12 March 2014 vs 12 July 2010
Pipelines 640 vs 336
Floating-point performance 1,155 gflops vs 907.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt vs 160 Watt
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 768 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2513 vs 2263
Geekbench - OpenCL 9697 vs 7786
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 37.761 vs 21.445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.428 vs 1.823
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 38.889 vs 27.222
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 151.016 vs 40.61
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3817 vs 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3817 vs 3351

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

  • Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 37.8 GTexel / s vs 36.08 GTexel / s
  • Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 385 vs 226
  • Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 617.847 vs 388.248
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3685
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3685
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 37.8 GTexel / s vs 36.08 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 385 vs 226
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 617.847 vs 388.248
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 vs 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 vs 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2513
2263
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
226
385
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
9697
7786
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
37.761
21.445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
388.248
617.847
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2.428
1.823
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
38.889
27.222
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
151.016
40.61
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3817
3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3685
3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3817
3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3685
3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3356
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
PassMark - G3D Mark 2513 2263
PassMark - G2D Mark 226 385
Geekbench - OpenCL 9697 7786
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 37.761 21.445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 388.248 617.847
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.428 1.823
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 38.889 27.222
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 151.016 40.61
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3817 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3685 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3817 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3685 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 979 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Fermi
Code name GM107 GF104
Launch date 12 March 2014 12 July 2010
Place in performance rating 940 943
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $229
Price now $89.99
Value for money (0-100) 34.71

Technical info

CUDA cores 640
Floating-point performance 1,155 gflops 907.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 640 336
Texture fill rate 36.08 GTexel / s 37.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt 160 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 1,950 million
Core clock speed 675 MHz

Video outputs and ports

7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI Internal
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 16x PCI-E 2.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Height 4.376"(111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Length 8.25"(210 mm) (21 cm)
SLI options 2-way
Supplementary power connectors 6-pin & 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 768 MB
Memory bandwidth 80.0 GB / s 86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 192 Bit
Memory type DDR3, GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0
Standard memory configuration DDR3 or GDDR5
Memory clock speed 3600 MHz

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
Adaptive VSync
Ansel
BatteryBoost
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
TXAA
3D Vision