NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 915 MHz vs 888 MHz
Around 73% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 130 Watt
Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB

Launch date	10 March 2014 vs 27 June 2013
Boost clock speed	915 MHz vs 888 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 130 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1536 MB

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM

Around 3% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 797 MHz
Around 96% higher texture fill rate: 85.25 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
Around 80% higher pipelines: 1152 vs 640
Around 47% better floating-point performance: 2,046 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11782 vs 10427
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3684
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3684
Around 16% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1333 vs 1151

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	823 MHz vs 797 MHz
Texture fill rate	85.25 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1152 vs 640
Floating-point performance	2,046 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	11782 vs 10427
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3713 vs 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 vs 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3713 vs 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 vs 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1333 vs 1151

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

10427

11782

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3684

3713

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3340

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3684

3713

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3340

3353

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

1151

1333

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark	3072
PassMark - G2D Mark	226
Geekbench - OpenCL	10427	11782
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	22.828
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	210.585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	28.662
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	162.83
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4938
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3684	3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3340	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4938
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3684	3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3340	3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1151	1333

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK104	GK104
Launch date	10 March 2014	27 June 2013
Place in performance rating	853	854
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	915 MHz	888 MHz
Core clock speed	797 MHz	823 MHz
CUDA cores	1152 or 640
Floating-point performance	1,389 gflops	2,046 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	640	1152
Texture fill rate	43.4 GTexel / s	85.25 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	130 Watt
Transistor count	3,540 million	3,540 million
Video outputs and ports
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
Length		241 mm
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1536 MB
Memory bandwidth	80.0 GB / s	134.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Standard memory configuration	GDDR5
Memory clock speed		5600 MHz
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
Adaptive VSync
Ansel
BatteryBoost
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
TXAA