NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 657 MHz
- Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 915 MHz vs 657 MHz
- Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 42.05 GTexel / s
- Around 38% better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 1,009 gflops
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3072 vs 1714
- Around 86% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10427 vs 5605
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.828 vs 15.673
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.427 vs 1.512
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 162.83 vs 53.992
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4938 vs 2836
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 2728
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4938 vs 2836
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 2728
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 March 2014 vs 30 May 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 797 MHz vs 657 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 915 MHz vs 657 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s vs 42.05 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops vs 1,009 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3072 vs 1714 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10427 vs 5605 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.828 vs 15.673 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.427 vs 1.512 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.83 vs 53.992 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4938 vs 2836 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 2728 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4938 vs 2836 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 2728 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3333 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 231 vs 226
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 509.958 vs 210.585
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.422 vs 28.662
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 231 vs 226 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 509.958 vs 210.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.422 vs 28.662 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3072 | 1714 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 226 | 231 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10427 | 5605 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.828 | 15.673 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 210.585 | 509.958 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.427 | 1.512 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.662 | 30.422 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.83 | 53.992 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4938 | 2836 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 2728 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4938 | 2836 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 2728 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3333 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1151 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK104 | GK106 |
| Launch date | 10 March 2014 | 30 May 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 853 | 1114 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 915 MHz | 657 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 797 MHz | 657 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | 768 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 1,009 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
| Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s | 42.05 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | Up to 3840x2160 |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | Up to 3840x2160 |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | Up to 1920x1200 |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | Up to 2048x1536 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | large |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6790
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
NVIDIAP106-090
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
NVIDIAT400
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
AppleM2 8-core
