NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 21% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 797 MHz versus 657 MHz
- Environ 39% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 915 MHz versus 657 MHz
- Environ 3% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 43.4 GTexel / s versus 42.05 GTexel / s
- Environ 38% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,389 gflops versus 1,009 gflops
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3072 versus 1714
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 10427 versus 5605
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.828 versus 15.673
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.427 versus 1.512
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 162.83 versus 53.992
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4938 versus 2836
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 versus 2728
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4938 versus 2836
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 versus 2728
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 10 March 2014 versus 30 May 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 797 MHz versus 657 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 915 MHz versus 657 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.4 GTexel / s versus 42.05 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops versus 1,009 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3072 versus 1714 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10427 versus 5605 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.828 versus 15.673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.427 versus 1.512 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.83 versus 53.992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4938 versus 2836 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 versus 2728 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 versus 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4938 versus 2836 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 versus 2728 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 versus 3333 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 640
- Environ 36% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 231 versus 226
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 509.958 versus 210.585
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.422 versus 28.662
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 768 versus 640 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 231 versus 226 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 509.958 versus 210.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.422 versus 28.662 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3072 | 1714 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 226 | 231 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10427 | 5605 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.828 | 15.673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 210.585 | 509.958 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.427 | 1.512 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.662 | 30.422 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.83 | 53.992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4938 | 2836 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 2728 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4938 | 2836 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 2728 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3333 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1151 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Nom de code | GK104 | GK106 |
Date de sortie | 10 March 2014 | 30 May 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 853 | 1114 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 915 MHz | 657 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 797 MHz | 657 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 1152 or 640 | 768 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops | 1,009 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.4 GTexel / s | 42.05 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 55 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 2,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | Up to 3840x2160 |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | Up to 3840x2160 |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | Up to 1920x1200 |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | Up to 2048x1536 |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support |