NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 99% higher core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 27.1x more texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 1.6 GTexel / s
- 80x more pipelines: 640 vs 8
- 108.5x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 12.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 31.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3047 vs 97
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 vs 190
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 March 2014 vs 9 May 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 797 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s vs 1.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 8 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops vs 12.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3047 vs 97 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 vs 190 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M
- 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 75 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3047 | 97 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | 190 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10305 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.828 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 210.585 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.416 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.662 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.83 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4938 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4938 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1151 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
| Code name | GK104 | G86 |
| Launch date | 10 March 2014 | 9 May 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 904 | 907 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 915 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 797 MHz | 400 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 12.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 8 |
| Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s | 1.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | 11.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3, GDDR2 |
| Shared memory | 0 | yes |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| nView | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 130M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
ATIRadeon Xpress 1150 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150M + nForce 630M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
AMDRadeon Vega 11
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX250
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M vs
NVIDIAT400
