NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M versus NVIDIA Quadro 7000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M and NVIDIA Quadro 7000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 45% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 941 MHz versus 651 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 108.3 GTexel / s versus 41.66 GTexel / s
- 2.6x plus de pipelines: 1344 versus 512
- Environ 95% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,599 gflops versus 1,332 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 204 Watt
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.836 versus 32.699
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 59.57 versus 51.693
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 versus 2 May 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 941 MHz versus 651 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 108.3 GTexel / s versus 41.66 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,599 gflops versus 1,332 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 204 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.836 versus 32.699 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.57 versus 51.693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3705 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 7000
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 3 GB
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 397 versus 279
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1142.156 versus 960.114
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.796 versus 3.038
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 110.277 versus 81.753
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 3 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3505 versus 3496 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 397 versus 279 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1142.156 versus 960.114 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.796 versus 3.038 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 110.277 versus 81.753 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 7000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | NVIDIA Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3496 | 3505 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 279 | 397 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.836 | 32.699 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 960.114 | 1142.156 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.038 | 3.796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.57 | 51.693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.753 | 110.277 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6350 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6350 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1336 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | NVIDIA Quadro 7000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GK104 | GF110 |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 | 2 May 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 691 | 692 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $14,499 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 967 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 941 MHz | 651 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1344 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,599 gflops | 1,332 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1344 | 512 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 108.3 GTexel / s | 41.66 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 204 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Longeur | 248 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 3 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 120.0 GB / s | 177.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3404 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
ATIMobility Radeon X2300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3850
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
ATIFirePro V8800
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
NVIDIAQuadro 7000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
NVIDIATesla K80m
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
AMDRadeon E8950
