NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 64% higher texture fill rate: 127.1 GTexel / s vs 77.7 billion / sec
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1024
- Around 23% better floating-point performance: 3,050 gflops vs 2x 1,244.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 365 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU)
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3837 vs 3341
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15023 vs 12811
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.273 vs 30.921
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.914 vs 3.799
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4501 vs 4118
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3683
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3330
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4501 vs 4118
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3683
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3330
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 24 March 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 127.1 GTexel / s vs 77.7 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 1024 |
Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops vs 2x 1,244.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt vs 365 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3837 vs 3341 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 vs 12811 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.273 vs 30.921 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.914 vs 3.799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 vs 4118 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 vs 4118 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3330 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 954 MHz
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 394 vs 331
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1116.126 vs 777.677
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.114 vs 38.196
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.239 vs 82.511
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 954 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 394 vs 331 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1116.126 vs 777.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.114 vs 38.196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.239 vs 82.511 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3837 | 3341 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 331 | 394 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 | 12811 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.273 | 30.921 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 777.677 | 1116.126 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.914 | 3.799 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.196 | 49.114 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 | 107.239 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 | 4118 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 | 4118 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3330 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GK104 | GF110 |
Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 24 March 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 777 | 779 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $184 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 30.41 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 1215 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1536 | 1024 |
Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops | 2x 1,244.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1024 |
Texture fill rate | 127.1 GTexel / s | 77.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 365 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Three Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 8-pin |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 11" (280 mm) (27.9 cm) | |
SLI options | Quad | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 327.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Memory clock speed | 1707 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Vision | ||
DSR | ||
Surround |