NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 64% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 127.1 GTexel / s versus 77.7 billion / sec
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 1024
- Environ 23% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,050 gflops versus 2x 1,244.2 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 122 Watt versus 365 Watt
- 2.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU)
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3837 versus 3341
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15023 versus 12811
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.273 versus 30.921
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.914 versus 3.799
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4501 versus 4118
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3683
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 3330
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4501 versus 4118
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3683
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 3330
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 versus 24 March 2011 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 127.1 GTexel / s versus 77.7 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 1024 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,050 gflops versus 2x 1,244.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt versus 365 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3837 versus 3341 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 versus 12811 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.273 versus 30.921 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.914 versus 3.799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 versus 4118 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 versus 4118 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3330 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
- Environ 27% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1215 MHz versus 954 MHz
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 394 versus 331
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1116.126 versus 777.677
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.114 versus 38.196
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.239 versus 82.511
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1215 MHz versus 954 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 394 versus 331 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1116.126 versus 777.677 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.114 versus 38.196 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.239 versus 82.511 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3837 | 3341 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 331 | 394 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 | 12811 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.273 | 30.921 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 777.677 | 1116.126 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.914 | 3.799 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.196 | 49.114 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 | 107.239 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 | 4118 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 | 4118 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3330 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GK104 | GF110 |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 | 24 March 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 777 | 779 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | |
| Prix maintenant | $184 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 30.41 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 993 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | 1024 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,050 gflops | 2x 1,244.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1024 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 127.1 GTexel / s | 77.7 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 365 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
| Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Three Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | Two 8-pin |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 11" (280 mm) (27.9 cm) | |
| Options SLI | Quad | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160.0 GB / s | 327.7 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1707 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| DSR | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6970M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 590
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAQuadro P520
