AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 122 Watt
• Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 525 vs 333
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 41.414 vs 36.688
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 112.347 vs 82.511

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 925 MHz
• 4.3x more texture fill rate: 127.1 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
• 3x more pipelines: 1536 vs 512
• 3.2x better floating-point performance: 3,050 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
• 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3818 vs 1931
• Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15023 vs 9800
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.42 vs 24.788
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 776.776 vs 638.196
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.915 vs 2.619
• Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4501 vs 2809
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3666
• Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4501 vs 2809
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3666

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1931 3818
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	525 333
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9800 15023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.788 34.42
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	638.196 776.776
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.619 3.915
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.414 36.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	112.347 82.511
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2809 4501
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3666 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2809 4501
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3666 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3356

Compare specifications (specs)