NVIDIA Quadro P520 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P520 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P520

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 954 MHz
  • Around 50% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 993 MHz
  • 188x more texture fill rate: 23.89 GTexel/s vs 127.1 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 12 March 2014
Core clock speed 1303 MHz vs 954 MHz
Boost clock speed 1493 MHz vs 993 MHz
Texture fill rate 23.89 GTexel/s vs 127.1 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

  • 4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 384
  • 14.8x lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 1800 million
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 331 vs 239
  • Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3837 vs 2096
  • Around 91% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15023 vs 7855
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4501 vs 3527
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4501 vs 3527
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3566
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3566
  • Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2295
  • Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2295
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 1536 vs 384
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 122 Watt vs 1800 million
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 331 vs 239
PassMark - G3D Mark 3837 vs 2096
Geekbench - OpenCL 15023 vs 7855
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4501 vs 3527
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4501 vs 3527
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 vs 3566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 vs 3566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 vs 2295
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 vs 2295

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
239
331
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2096
3837
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
7855
15023
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3527
4501
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3527
4501
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3566
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3566
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2295
3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2295
3356
Name NVIDIA Quadro P520 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
PassMark - G2D Mark 239 331
PassMark - G3D Mark 2096 3837
Geekbench - OpenCL 7855 15023
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3527 4501
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3527 4501
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3566 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3566 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2295 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2295 3356
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 46.273
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 777.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 38.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 82.511
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1611

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro P520 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

Essentials

Architecture Pascal Kepler
Code name GP108 GK104
Launch date 27 May 2019 12 March 2014
Place in performance rating 774 777
Type Mobile workstation Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1493 MHz 993 MHz
Core clock speed 1303 MHz 954 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 23.89 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 11.94 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 764.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines 384 1536
Pixel fill rate 23.89 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 23.89 GTexel/s 127.1 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 1800 million 122 Watt
CUDA cores 1536
Floating-point performance 3,050 gflops
Transistor count 3,540 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Multi monitor support
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Height PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size large large
Supplementary power connectors None None
Bus support PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Interface MXM-B (3.0)

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 1.2 1.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 40.10 GB/s 160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0
Standard memory configuration GDDR5

Technologies

Multi Monitor
3D Blu-Ray
BatteryBoost
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
TXAA