NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M and NVIDIA Quadro 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 66% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 574 MHz
• 4x more texture fill rate: 127.1 GTexel / s vs 32.1 GTexel / s
• 3.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 448
• 3x better floating-point performance: 3,050 gflops vs 1,027.7 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 204 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
• Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3783 vs 2707
• Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15023 vs 9891
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.42 vs 24.377
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.915 vs 2.66
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.688 vs 34.891
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4501 vs 3501
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3689
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3335
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4501 vs 3501
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3689
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3335

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 6000

• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 451 vs 332
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 793.755 vs 776.776
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 90.839 vs 82.511

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 6000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3783 2707
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	332 451
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	15023 9891
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	34.42 24.377
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	776.776 793.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.915 2.66
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	36.688 34.891
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	82.511 90.839
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4501 3501
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3689
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4501 3501
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3689
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3335

Compare specifications (specs)