NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs ATI Radeon X1300 PRO
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 and ATI Radeon X1300 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 71% higher core clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 20.5x more texture fill rate: 49.2 billion / sec vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 63.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5340 vs 84
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 641 vs 313
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 20 August 2015 vs 1 November 2006 |
| Core clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 49.2 billion / sec vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5340 vs 84 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 641 vs 313 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1300 PRO
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 31 Watt vs 90 Watt
- 133.3x more memory clock speed: 800 MHz vs 6.6 GB/s
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 31 Watt vs 90 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz vs 6.6 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1300 PRO
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | ATI Radeon X1300 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5340 | 84 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 641 | 313 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16728 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 60.473 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 758.865 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.279 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.738 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 231.508 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6803 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6803 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 105 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | ATI Radeon X1300 PRO | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | R500 |
| Code name | GM206 | RV516 |
| Launch date | 20 August 2015 | 1 November 2006 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | |
| Place in performance rating | 547 | 550 |
| Price now | $194.44 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 30.06 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1188 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1024 MHz | 600 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,825 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | |
| Texture fill rate | 49.2 billion / sec | 2.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 31 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,940 million | 107 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 7.938" (20.2 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| SLI options | 2x | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pins | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 105.6 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6.6 GB/s | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950 vs
ATIRadeon X1300 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3500M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2200M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 560X
