NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 78% higher core clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 2.1x more boost clock speed: 1188 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 3.6x more texture fill rate: 49.2 billion / sec vs 13.8 GTexel / s
- 32x more pipelines: 768 vs 24
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 17.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5340 vs 306
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 641 vs 309
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 20 August 2015 vs 1 March 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 575 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1188 MHz vs 575 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 49.2 billion / sec vs 13.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 24 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5340 vs 306 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 641 vs 309 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 90 Watt
- 200x more memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 6.6 GB/s
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 90 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 6.6 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5340 | 306 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 641 | 309 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16728 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 60.473 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 758.865 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.279 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.738 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 231.508 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6803 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6803 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 105 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Curie |
| Code name | GM206 | G71 |
| Launch date | 20 August 2015 | 1 March 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | $99.99 |
| Place in performance rating | 547 | 545 |
| Price now | $194.44 | $99.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 30.06 | 3.97 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1188 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1024 MHz | 575 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,825 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 24 |
| Texture fill rate | 49.2 billion / sec | 13.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,940 million | 278 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-III |
| Length | 7.938" (20.2 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| SLI options | 2x | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pins | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 105.6 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 700 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6.6 GB/s | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | 256 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||

