NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5750
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 and NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 425 MHz
- 28.9x more texture fill rate: 49.2 billion / sec vs 1.7 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 130 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 152.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5343 vs 35
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 642 vs 310
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 20 August 2015 vs 17 February 2004 |
| Core clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 425 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 49.2 billion / sec vs 1.7 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 130 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5343 vs 35 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 642 vs 310 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5750
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 90 Watt
- 91.7x more memory clock speed: 550 MHz vs 6.6 GB/s
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 90 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 550 MHz vs 6.6 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5750
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5343 | 35 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 642 | 310 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16715 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 60.473 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 758.865 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.279 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.738 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 231.508 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6803 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6803 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1863 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Rankine |
| Code name | GM206 | NV39 |
| Launch date | 20 August 2015 | 17 February 2004 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | |
| Place in performance rating | 533 | 530 |
| Price now | $194.44 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 30.06 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1188 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1024 MHz | 425 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,825 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 130 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | |
| Texture fill rate | 49.2 billion / sec | 1.7 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,940 million | 82 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 7.938" (20.2 cm) | 168 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| SLI options | 2x | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pins | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0a |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 105.6 GB / s | 8.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6.6 GB/s | 550 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950 vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5750
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4270
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950 vs
AMDFirePro M6000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950 vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX
