NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs AMD FirePro M6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 and AMD FirePro M6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • Around 54% higher texture fill rate: 49.2 billion / sec vs 32 GTexel / s
  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
  • Around 78% better floating-point performance: 1,825 gflops vs 1,024 gflops
  • 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5343 vs 1820
  • 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16715 vs 8095
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6803 vs 3024
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3697 vs 1832
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6803 vs 3024
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3697 vs 1832
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 20 August 2015 vs 1 July 2012
Core clock speed 1024 MHz vs 800 MHz
Texture fill rate 49.2 billion / sec vs 32 GTexel / s
Pipelines 768 vs 640
Floating-point performance 1,825 gflops vs 1,024 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 5343 vs 1820
Geekbench - OpenCL 16715 vs 8095
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6803 vs 3024
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3697 vs 1832
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6803 vs 3024
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3697 vs 1832

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M6000

  • 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 43 Watt vs 90 Watt
  • 666.7x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 6.6 GB/s
  • Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 776 vs 642
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 43 Watt vs 90 Watt
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz vs 6.6 GB/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 776 vs 642
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 vs 3356

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M6000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
5343
1820
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
642
776
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
16715
8095
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6803
3024
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3697
1832
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6803
3024
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3697
1832
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3357
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 AMD FirePro M6000
PassMark - G3D Mark 5343 1820
PassMark - G2D Mark 642 776
Geekbench - OpenCL 16715 8095
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 60.473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 758.865
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.279
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 29.738
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 231.508
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6803 3024
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3697 1832
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6803 3024
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3697 1832
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1863

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 AMD FirePro M6000

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell 2.0 GCN 1.0
Code name GM206 Heathrow
Launch date 20 August 2015 1 July 2012
Launch price (MSRP) $159
Place in performance rating 533 535
Price now $194.44
Type Desktop Mobile workstation
Value for money (0-100) 30.06

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1188 MHz
Core clock speed 1024 MHz 800 MHz
CUDA cores 768
Floating-point performance 1,825 gflops 1,024 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 768 640
Texture fill rate 49.2 billion / sec 32 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 90 Watt 43 Watt
Transistor count 2,940 million 1,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Audio input for HDMI Internal
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 No outputs
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support
StereoOutput3D

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0 n / a
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Length 7.938" (20.2 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 350 Watt
SLI options 2x
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pins None
Form factor MXM-B
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 105.6 GB / s 72 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 6.6 GB/s 4000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
SLI
Surround