NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1152 MHz vs 1024 MHz
• Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 1188 MHz
• Around 38% higher texture fill rate: 68.02 GTexel / s vs 49.2 billion / sec
• Around 19% better floating-point performance: 2,177 gflops vs 1,825 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 90 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 1168x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 6.6 GB/s
• Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19887 vs 16715
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1159.046 vs 758.865
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.507 vs 4.279
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.067 vs 29.738
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 293.638 vs 231.508
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8059 vs 6803
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8059 vs 6803
• Around 19% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2219 vs 1863

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

• Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 642 vs 347
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 60.473 vs 54.188
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3697 vs 3579
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3697 vs 3579

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5324 5343
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	347 642
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	19887 16715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.188 60.473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1159.046 758.865
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.507 4.279
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	82.067 29.738
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	293.638 231.508
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8059 6803
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3579 3697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8059 6803
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3579 3697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2219 1863

Compare specifications (specs)