NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A and ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 41% higher core clock speed: 914 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 15.3x more texture fill rate: 39.72 GTexel / s vs 2.6 GTexel / s
  • 16x more pipelines: 640 vs 40
  • 24.4x better floating-point performance: 1,271 gflops vs 52 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
  • 4x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • 21.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2605 vs 119
  • 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3289 vs 617
  • 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3289 vs 617
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 March 2015 vs 28 June 2007
Core clock speed 914 MHz vs 650 MHz
Texture fill rate 39.72 GTexel / s vs 2.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 640 vs 40
Floating-point performance 1,271 gflops vs 52 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2605 vs 119
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3289 vs 617
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3289 vs 617

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT

  • 3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 357 vs 264
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 357 vs 264

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2605
119
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
264
357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3289
617
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3289
617
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark 2605 119
PassMark - G2D Mark 264 357
Geekbench - OpenCL 10348
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1973
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1973
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2188
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2188
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3289 617
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3289 617

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell TeraScale
Code name GM107 RV610
Launch date 13 March 2015 28 June 2007
Place in performance rating 906 909
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 993 MHz
Core clock speed 914 MHz 650 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,271 gflops 52 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 640 40
Texture fill rate 39.72 GTexel / s 2.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 25 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 180 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.0
OpenGL 4.6 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Memory bandwidth 64 GB / s 8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3