NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A and ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A

ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 8 month(s) later
Around 41% higher core clock speed: 914 MHz vs 650 MHz
15.3x more texture fill rate: 39.72 GTexel / s vs 2.6 GTexel / s
16x more pipelines: 640 vs 40
24.4x better floating-point performance: 1,271 gflops vs 52 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
4x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
21.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2593 vs 119
5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3289 vs 617
5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3289 vs 617

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 March 2015 vs 28 June 2007
Core clock speed	914 MHz vs 650 MHz
Texture fill rate	39.72 GTexel / s vs 2.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 40
Floating-point performance	1,271 gflops vs 52 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2593 vs 119
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3289 vs 617
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3289 vs 617

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT

3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 357 vs 271

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	357 vs 271

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2593

119

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

271

357

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3289

617

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3289

617

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A	ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark	2593	119
PassMark - G2D Mark	271	357
Geekbench - OpenCL	10220
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1973
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1973
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2188
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2188
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3289	617
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3289	617

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A	ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale
Code name	GM107	RV610
Launch date	13 March 2015	28 June 2007
Place in performance rating	906	918
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	993 MHz
Core clock speed	914 MHz	650 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,271 gflops	52 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	640	40
Texture fill rate	39.72 GTexel / s	2.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	25 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	180 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	256 MB
Memory bandwidth	64 GB / s	8 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3