NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M vs NVIDIA GeForce 810M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M and NVIDIA GeForce 810M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
• Around 24% higher core clock speed: 914 MHz vs 738 MHz
• 7.6x more texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
• 13.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 48
• 10.2x better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 1000 or 2500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• 6.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2577 vs 418
• 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 vs 66
• 6.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9744 vs 1607
• 9.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.396 vs 4.403
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 373.644 vs 131.239
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4148 vs 1076
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1833
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3035
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4148 vs 1076
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1833
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3035

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 810M

• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 810M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2577 418
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	217 66
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9744 1607
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42.396 4.403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	373.644 131.239
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4148 1076
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 1833
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3035
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4148 1076
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 1833
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3035

Compare specifications (specs)