NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M versus NVIDIA GeForce 810M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M and NVIDIA GeForce 810M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 24% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 914 MHz versus 738 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 44.96 GTexel / s versus 5.904 GTexel / s
- 13.3x plus de pipelines: 640 versus 48
- 10.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,439 gflops versus 141.7 gflops
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 39% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1000 or 2500 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 6.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2577 versus 418
- 3.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 versus 66
- 6.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9744 versus 1607
- 9.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.396 versus 4.403
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 373.644 versus 131.239
- 3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4148 versus 1076
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 1833
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3035
- 3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4148 versus 1076
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 1833
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3035
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 24 March 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 914 MHz versus 738 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 44.96 GTexel / s versus 5.904 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 48 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,439 gflops versus 141.7 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 or 2500 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2577 versus 418 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 versus 66 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9744 versus 1607 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.396 versus 4.403 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 373.644 versus 131.239 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4148 versus 1076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4148 versus 1076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3035 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 810M
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 75 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 810M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | NVIDIA GeForce 810M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2577 | 418 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 | 66 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9744 | 1607 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.396 | 4.403 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 373.644 | 131.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.54 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.412 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.158 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4148 | 1076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4148 | 1076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3035 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3350 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | NVIDIA GeForce 810M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GF117 |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 24 March 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 797 | 1437 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 914 MHz | 738 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,439 gflops | 141.7 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 48 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 44.96 GTexel / s | 5.904 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 32 or 80 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 or 2500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 or GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M vs
ATIRadeon HD 4550
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K1200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M vs
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M vs
AMDRadeon RX 640
